INTERACTIVE
EFFECTS OF FLAXSEED AND TAMOXIFEN ON
HUMAN BREAST CANCER
Lilian U. Thompson, Jianmin Chen, Evon Hui, Jaskaren Mann and
Terence Ip Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine,
University of Toronto,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E2
INTRODUCTION
Flaxseed is the richest source of the phytoestrogen lignans, containing
75-800 times higher concentration than other plant foods in the
vegetarian diet. It is also a very rich source of a-linolenic acid,
representing more than 50% of its oil. Because these compounds
have been suggested to have anticancer effects, flaxseed is a food
that has a very high potential to reduce cancer risk.
Therefore, for more than a decade, our laboratory
has been studying the effects of flaxseed and its components on
the different stages
of carcinogenesis, particularly breast cancer. These studies
have shown that feeding flaxseed to rats prior to initiation
with the
mammary carcinogen dimethylbenzanthracene resulted in lower mammary
cell nuclear aberration, tumor incidence and number (1,2). When
fed at the post-initiation or early promotion stage of carcinogenesis,
flaxseed reduced the tumor size and number (2). At the late promotion
stage, flaxseed regressed the established tumor size (3). A regression
in tumor size was also suggested by the reduced cell proliferation
in the tumor of breast cancer patients given flaxseed from the
time of diagnosis to the time of surgery (4). Furthermore, reduction
in tumor size and metastasis was observed upon feeding flaxseed
to athymic mice (immunodeficient mice) with established human
estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors (MDA MB 435) (5,6).
The antitumorigenic
effect of secoisolariciresinol diglycoside (SDG), the major mammalian
lignan precursor in flaxseed, was similar to those of flaxseed
(3,7) indicating that the effect of flaxseed is largely dependent
on its SDG. Despite these observations, there is very little
known regarding the effect of flaxseed on human ER positive
breast cancer
under controlled conditions of high or low levels of estrogen
simulating conditions in pre- and post-menopausal women, respectively.
There
is also limited study on the interaction of flaxseed with breast
cancer drug such as tamoxifen (TAM). Interaction has been studied
in ER negative breast cancer cells but not in ER positive cells
(8).
TAM is a well known adjuvant therapy for breast
cancer particularly those that are ER positive (9). However, TAM
poses a few problems.
It is usually good for only five years, beyond which patients
develop TAM resistance -- i.e. tumors start growing again (9).
There is also
a small risk of endometrial cancer and blood clots in some
individuals. Because TAM is an antiestrogen, it also causes
menopausal-like
symptoms such as hot flashes. Thus many breast cancer patients
taking TAM report increasing use of complementary dietary supplements
including phytoestrogen-rich foods such as soy and flaxseed,
instead of taking hormone replacement therapy, to reduce menopausal-like
symptoms and also to supplement the tumor-reducing effect
of TAM
(10). However, we question whether phytoestrogen-rich foods
such as soy and flaxseed interfere with the effectivenesss
of TAM.
Studies with soy are controversial because some studies showed
complementary
effect of TAM with soy products such as miso (11) while other
studies showed interference by genistein, a soy isoflavone
(12). Nevertheless,
we hypothesized that flaxseed complements rather than antagonizes
the tumor reducing effect of
TAM. This is because some of the mechanisms whereby TAM and flaxseed
and its lignans reduce tumorigenesis are similar and/or complementary
-- e.g. hormone-related mechanisms such as antiestrogen and anti-aromatase
(enzymes involved in estrogen synthesis) activities; non- hormone
related mechanisms such as antioxidant, anti-angiogenesis, increasing
apoptosis, and affecting growth factor expression (decrease IGF-1
and TGF-a., increase TGF-b) (5,6,9,13-15). In particular, the
anti-aromatase activity of the flaxseed lignans is of interest
in light of recent studies, which showed that some
aromatase inhibitors are more effective in reducing tumor growth
than TAM (16).
Therefore the overall objectives of the following studies were:
to determine the effect of flaxseed and TAM, alone and in combination,
on the growth of ER positive human breast cancer cells (MCF -
7) and uterus in athymic mice in the presence of high or low levels
of circulating estrogen, simulating pre- and post-menopausal
conditions,
respectively, and to determine if the effect of flaxseed is dose-dependent.
STUDY l
Specific objective: This study was conducted to determine the
effect of flaxseed and TAM, alone and in combination, on
ER positive breast
cancer at low level of circulating estrogens.
Methods: Ovariectomized athymic
mice (balb/c nu/nu) were acclimatized for one week while being
fed the basal diet
(BD; AIN-93G).
At week 0, they were then injected with 5xl05 MCF-7 cells
at 4 sites
(right
and left thoracic and abdominal mammary fat pads) and implanted
with estradiol pellet (1.7 mg, 60 day release; Innovation
Research of America, Sarasota, FL) to allow the tumors
to grow. Weekly
palpation of the tumors started two weeks after the tumor
injection. At week
7, when the tumors were about 40 mm2, mice were divided
into 5 groups such that their tumor sizes were similar. One
group
had
the E2 pellet replaced and served as the positive control
(+E2 group). The other four groups had the E2 pellet removed
and
not replaced so they all had low circulating levels of
estrogen. One
group was fed the BD and served as a negative control (-E2
group). The other three groups were treated as follows:
fed a 10% flaxseed
diet (l0F), fed BD and given an implant of TAM pellet (5mg;
TAM group; will result in blood TAM levels equivalent to
that in
women taking 20 mg TAM daily), or fed 10% flaxseed plus
given TAM implant
(IOF+TAM). Tumor palpation was continued until week 13
for the +E2 group and at week 14 for all the other groups.
The
+E2 group
had to be sacrificed earlier because of their large tumors.
The tumors were measured for volume and weight and analyzed
for cell
proliferation (as Ki67 labeling index) and apoptosis (by
Tunel technique). Uterine weights were also noted.
Results: The palpable tumor areas
of the +E2 group continued to increase while that of the
-E2 group significantly regressed over time, indicating
that the model system was working. The 10F group had
palpable tumor areas
over time that did not differ significantly from that
of the negative control group. TAM initially caused significant
regression
of the
tumors, but then caused an increase after three weeks
of
treatment i.e. the mice started showing TAM resistance.
However,
combining
flaxseed with TAM prevented the later increase in palpable
tumor size caused by TAM such that the final tumor size
of the 10F+TAM
group was significantly lower than that of the TAM group,
although still significantly higher than that of the
10F or negative
control group. The tumor volumes and weights at sacrifice
followed the
same pattern seen in the
palpable tumor areas. When tumor cell proliferation was measured,
the pattern of results was similar to that of the tumor volumes
and weights, i.e. significantly lower proliferation in the IOF
group compared with the +E2 control group, significantly higher
proliferation in the TAM group than in the IOF group, and the proliferation
in the IOF+TAM group intermediate between the IOF and TAM groups.
On the other hand, compared with the positive control, IOF significantly
increased the tumor cell apoptosis (programmed cell death). TAM
also increased the cell apoptosis but to a significantly lesser
extent than with 10F alone. When combined with flaxseed, TAM led
to apoptosis that did not differ significantly from that of 10F
alone. The uterine weight was not changed in the IOF group but
was increased in the TAM group. Combining the 10F with TAM reduced
the uterine weights but to levels that did not differ significantly
from all other groups. The food intake and body weights of negative
control and treatment groups did not differ significantly suggesting
that the tumor effects were not related to these parameters.
Conclusion: In the presence of low circulating estrogens, flaxseed
reduced the growth of ER positive human breast cancer and enhanced
rather than antagonized the tumor inhibiting effect of TAM but
caused no significant effect on uterine weight when fed alone
or in combination with TAM treatment. The tumor regression
was related
to a reduction in tumor cell proliferation and an increase in
cell apoptosis.
STUDY 2
Specific objective: This study was conducted to determine the
effect of flaxseed, alone or in combination with TAM, on
the growth of
ER positive human breast cancer in the presence of high level
of estrogen to simulate premenopausal conditions.
Methods: The study design was similar to that in Study 1
except that after the tumors have reached the size of about
40 mm2,
the mice were divided into 5 groups: One group had the E2
pellet removed
and not replaced and served as the negative control (-E2
group). The other groups had the E2 pellet replaced so they
all had
high circulating levels of estrogen. One group was fed the
BD and
served as a positive control (+E2 group). The other three
groups were
treated as follows: fed a 10% flaxseed diet (1 OF), fed BD
and given an implant of TAM pellet as above (TAM), or fed
10F plus
given a TAM implant (10F+TAM). Treatment time was 6 weeks.
Results: There were no significant effects of treatments
on total body weight and food intake. Compared with the positive
control,
all treatments significantly lowered the palpable tumor areas
over time and the final tumor volumes and weights at sacrifice.
The
strongest inhibitory effect on tumor growth was caused by
the
10F+ TAM, followed by the TAM, and then the IOF treatments.
The tumor
inhibitory effect of 10F+TAM was not significantly greater
than TAM alone but was significantly stronger than 10F alone.
The
tumor cell proliferation, as Ki67 labeling index, was significantly
lower
in all treatment groups compared with the positive control.
However, while the TAM and 10F groups did not differ significantly,
the
IOF+TAM group had significantly lower tumor cell proliferation
than either the IOF or TAM groups. The tumor cell apoptosis
was significantly increased by all treatment groups compared
with
the positive control but the treatment groups did not differ
significantly
from each other. All treatment groups had no significant
effect on uterine weight.
Conclusion: At high E2 level, 10F and TAM alone had an antitumorigenic
effect on ER+ tumors without increasing uterine weight. In
combination, 10F and TAM induced greater inhibitory effect
on tumor growth
than when used alone. The effect of 10F and TAM, alone or in
combination, was related to decreased cell proliferation and
increased apoptosis.
STUDY 3
Specific objective: This study was conducted to determine the
dose-dependent effect of flaxseed, alone and in combination
with TAM, on the growth
of ER positive human breast cancer in the presence of high
level of estrogen to simulate premenopausal situation.
Methods: The study design was
the same as in Study 2 except that two additional groups were
tested i.e. 5% flaxseed (5F) and 5F in combination with
TAM (5F+TAM), and the treatment time was 7 weeks.
Results: Compared with the positive
control, all treatments did not affect the food intake and body
weight but significantly
reduced the palpable tumor growth over time and the tumor
volume and weight
at animal sacrifice. The tumor size in the 10F group
was significantly lower than that in the 5F group and did not
differ significantly
from that in the TAM group. When flaxseed was combined
with TAM,
the tumor size was further reduced with the greatest
effect
observed with 5F. The uterine weight was not affected
by all the treatments
except in the case of the 5F+ TAM group, which showed
significantly lower uterine weight than the 5F group.
Conclusion: At high estrogen
levels, there was a dose dependent inhibitory effect of flaxseed
on tumor growth,
with 10F
being more effective than 5F. TAM and 10F alone inhibited
tumor
growth to
the same extent without increasing uterine weight.
5F in combination with TAM induced significantly greater
inhibitory
effect on
tumor growth and caused lower uterine weight than 5F
alone, indicating
increased antiestrogenic effect.
OVERALL CONCLUSION
Flaxseed inhibited the growth of ER+ MCF 7 human breast
cancer in nude mice in the presence of high or
low levels of estrogen.
The effect of flaxseed at high estrogen level was
dose dependent. Flaxseed enhanced rather than antagonized
the inhibitory
effect of TAM on the growth of ER+ human breast
cancer in nude mice.
TAM and flaxseed components reduced the tumor growth
by decreasing the tumor cell proliferation and
increasing apoptosis. Other
mechanisms
likely include those that have been mentioned earlier.
The results are encouraging and provide some scientific
justification
for
the clinical testing of flaxseed in both pre- and
post- menopausal breast cancer patients taking TAM. If similar
results are
observed in patients, then flaxseed may be consumed
with TAM to help
reduce TAM resistance i.e. tumor growth after prolonged
intake of tamoxifen.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thanks to NSERC and NIH for financial support,
and to Omega Products for supply of flaxseed.
REFERENCES
- Serraino MR, Thompson LV. Effect of flaxseed
on early markers of risk for mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett
60: 135-142,
1991
- Serraino MR, Thompson LV. Effect of flaxseed on the
initiation and promotional stages of mammary carcinogensis.
Nutr Cancer
17: 153-159, 1992
- Thompson LV, Rickard SE, Orcheson LJ, Seidl,
M. Flaxseed and its lignan and oil components reduce mammary
tumor growth
at
a late stage of carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 17: 1373-1376,1996
- Thompson LU, Li T, Chen J, Goss PE. Biological effects of
dietary flaxseed in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer
Res Treat. 64: 50, 2000
- Chen J, Stavro PM, Thompson LV. Dietary
flaxseed inhibits breast cancer growth and metastasis and downregulates
expression of epidermal
growth factor receptor and insulin growth factor. Nutr
Cancer 43: 187-192,2002
- Dabrosin C, Chen J, Wang L,
Thompson LU. Flaxseed inhibits metastasis and decreases extracelular
vascular
endothelial
growth factor in
human breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Lett 2002;
185:31-37,2002
- Thompson LU, Seidl MM, Rickard SE, Orcheson LJ,
Fong, H. Antitumorigenic effect of a mammalian
lignan precursor from flaxseed. Nutr Cancer 26: 159-165, 1996
- Chen J, Thompson LV. Lignans and tamoxifen, alone or in combination,
reduce human breast cancer
cell
adhesion, invasion
and migration
in vitro. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 80: 163-70,
2002
- MacGregor J, Craig Jordan V. Basic guide to
the mechanism of anti estrogen action. Pharmacol
Rev
50:152-193,1998
- Van de Creek L, Rogers E, Lester
J, Use of alternative therapies among breast cancer outpatients
compared
with the general population.
Alter Ther Health Med 5:71-76, 1999
- Gotoh
T, Yamada K, Ito A, Yin H, Kataoka T, Dohi K. Chemoprevention
of N-nitroso- N-
methylurea-induced rat
mammary cancer by
miso and tamoxifen, alone and combination.
Jpn J
Cancer Res 89:487-495,
1998
- Ju YH, Doerge DR, Allred KF, Allred
CD, Helferich WG. Dietary genistein negates the
inhibitory
effect of tamoxifen
on growth
of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer
(MCF- 7) cells implanted in athymic mice.
Cancer
Res 62:2474-2477,
2002
- Charlier C, Chariot A, Antoine N,
Merville MP, Gielen, J, Castronovo V., Tamoxifen
and its active
metabolite
inhibit growth
of estrogen
receptor negative MDA MB 435 cells. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 49: 351-358, 1995
- Palmieri,
C, Cheng GJ, Saji S, Zeladu-HedmanM, Warn A, WeihuaZ, et al.
Estrogen receptor
beta in breast cancer.
Estrogen related
cancer 9:1-13,2002.
- Saarinen N, Makela
S, Santti R. Mechanism of anticancer effects of
lignans with
a special emphasis on breast cancer.
In Flaxseed in Human Nutrition (Thompson
LV, Cunnane
SC, eds) AOCS
Press,
Champaign ILL
2003
- Buzdar AU. Data from the Arimidex,
Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination
(ATAC)Trial: Implications
for use
of aromatase
inhibitors
in 2003.
Clin Cancer Res 10:355s-361s, 2004
Reprinted from the Proceedings of the 58th (or
59th) US Flax Institute Symposium, with permission. This article
has
been published in Clinical Cancer Research 10:7703-7711
(Nov 15, 2004 issue).